Monday, March 03, 2008

Who Filed IRS Complaint?




As everyone knows by now, the United Church of Christ in under investigation by the IRS. We’ve been charged with somehow promoting the presidential campaign of Barack Obama by inviting him to speak at our General Synod last summer. Senator Obama is a member of the UCC and was among 60 different speakers at Synod and as this video shows his appearance was not a campaign event. He was invited to talk about his faith.

So who filed the IRS complaint? One columnist, believes it was the person behind UCCtruths. Street Prophets begs to differ:
I don't agree with McEnroe's idea that UCCTruths is behind the IRS complaint. Chuck Currie's closer to the mark when he says "Once again UCCtruths turns up as a front for conservative groups trying to undermine the ministries of the United Church of Christ." They're mostly interested in kvetching about the UCC, but whoever filed that complaint had some legal assistance. That'd take too much initiative for the UCCTruths folks.

Nor do I think McEnroe's snarky idea that the complaint came from one Hxxxxxy Cxxxxxn is accurate. Since the letter to the IRS is more focused on the UCC than on Obama, my hunch is that whoever it was had an axe to grind with the denomination. I'm guessing it was the Biblical Witness Fellowship or one of their supporters. We'll never know, of course, so my guess will have to remain just that. But they have the obvious motive and means. Draw your own conclusions.

Biblical Witness Fellowship (BWF), for those who don't know, is a group aligned with the Institute on Religion and Democracy, a conservative political group whose stated mission is to "reform mainline churches." And by "reform" they mean destroy. IRD has spent millions of dollars over the years trying to discredit church leaders - upset over positions taken by mainline churches related to the war in Iraq (IRD supports it) or global warming (IRD doesn't believe global warming is real). They are so far to the right that they often criticize the Religious Right for not being conservative enough. BWF, a group formed to fight the UCC's pro-choice stance and that has worked to oppose basic civil rights for gays and lesbians, is part of IRD's so-called "Association for Church Renewal."

Note: Cartoon used by permission from Bob Englehart

11 comments:

Drew said...

Here's the link to the Hartfor Courant article you forgot to link to:

http://www.courant.com/news/health/hc-colin030208.artmar02,0,5476332.column

RVAnonesuch said...

you also do not post the pdf of the IRS complaint, which has been available on UCCtruths since August 2007. It appears to outline the specific violations of which the UCC stands accused.

http://www.ucctruths.com/irs.pdf

Rev. Chuck Currie said...

Yes, it is a bit odd that that site had a copy of the letter long before the IRS made contact with the UCC. And why is UCCtruths hiding the id of the person who wrote it?

In any event, the IRS letter has been linked to on this blog site. I'm not trying to hide anything.

RVAnonesuch said...

I think the real question is where is the text of the notification that the UCC was recently handed by IRS? Why hasn't *that* been posted? What did they know and when?

Do you think a blogger with access to the UCC National Office would be able to find this sort of official document?

Rev. Chuck Currie said...

Well, it has been posted. Several days ago.

http://www.ucc.org/news/pdf/lettrirs.pdf

The UCNews stories linked to on this blog (if you had a chance to read them) provided this.

RVAnonesuch said...

Thanks... but where are the enclosures (1) list of questions (2) constitutional and administrative rights

Rev. Chuck Currie said...

I would guess that the constitutional and administrative rights is simply a form (perhaps available on the IRS website). The questions referenced are being answered by Seth Waxman and his staff. I'm sure that once his team has the chance to respond on our behalf that UCNews will have additional information.

RVAnonesuch said...

Thanks... based on the letter from Ms. Ramirez, I googled "IRC 7611" and found Exhibit 4.76.7-3 (06-01-2004)
"Statement of Administrative and Constitutional Rights"

http://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/ch53s07.html#d0e644790


I think it would be more complete information to know what exactly the IRS is specifically concerned about.

Winged Hussar 1683 said...

[Not legal advice, I am not a lawyer]

(1) I read Obama's speech and it contains substantial campaign-related content. The word "President" is mentioned twice by Obama during his speech.

(2) The IRS also alleges that the Obama campaign set up 40 tables near the event.

However, the church says the Obama campaign agreed beforehand that no campaign activity would take place. It seems that Obama & Co. broke their word and exploited the tax exempt resources of Obama's own church. That does not speak very highly of Obama.

sciberus said...

I've been reading all the comments about Sen Obama's campaign people setting up tables in front of the Hartford Convention Center - this is true. However, what most seem not to understand is that they were NOT invited by the UCC and that they were located on public property and the UCC had no legal way to stop them from doing what they were doing. I was among those attending Synod and having his tables outside didn't bother me one way or another. It's a sad comment when we can't invite a person in the public arena to come and share their faith journey and their hopes for a better way of life for the people of this country.

Brett said...

Now there are groups urging pastors to speak directly about candidates this September, in order to force a lawsuit to overturn this IRS rule created by Lyndon Johnson ( http:blogs.pioneerlocal.com/religion/ ). If that happens, by October this investigation will be small potatoes.